mcclatchy, knight ridder, gannett, medianews

Let me join the journalists who are rooting for McClatchy to buy Knight Ridder (if it must be bought). McClatchy‘s a good, family-controlled newspaper company that runs a bunch of not-huge but journalistically solid papers (Raleigh, Minneapolis, and Sacramento being the biggest). (It actually reminds me a bit of the two good, family-controlled newspaper companies I’ve worked for, in Toledo and Dallas.)
Knight Ridder used to have a similar reputation in the industry, but that’s soured a bit in recent years (although they still publish some fine papers that employ some fine friends of mine.) In any event, McClatchy would be leagues better than the other apparent candidate for the company, a joint effort of Gannett and MediaNews, neither of which is…well, you never know when I might want a job with them, so I’ll be quiet.

2 thoughts on “mcclatchy, knight ridder, gannett, medianews”

  1. come now — whatever its faults, it’s hard to argue with the facts that the blade (a) pays substantially more than most papers its size and (b) does better journalism than most papers its size. after all, within a few months, it will have won or been finalists for three pulitzers in the last six years. that ain’t bad.

Comments are closed.